[Degree of control of cardiovascular risk factors among a patient population with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2]. / Grado de control de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en una población de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 y 2 de difícil manejo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of control of metabolic goals in a group of very selected type 1 and 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was done. Patients were enrolled consecutively in the Diabetes Clinic in a tertiary-care hospital in México City during the period between april and july 2005. The population at this clinic is very selected as demonstrated by the fact that all type 2 diabetic patients were treated with drugs for diabetic control, including insulin in 43% of them. We used the goals recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as parameters to analyze and additionally included non-HDL cholesterol and the atherogenic index. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients were included; 468 (58.8% female) had type 2 diabetes, with an average age of 58.5 years; 62 (65% female) patients had type 1 diabetes, with an average age of 31.2 years. The mean HbA1c values were 10.2 +/- 2.8 and 9.0 +/- 2.4 in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, respectively. The proportion of diabetic type 1 and 2 patients reaching treatment goals were 12.9% and 23.7% for HbA1c (p=0.02), 82.2% and 57.2% for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.0001), 75.8% and 49.3% for triglycerides (p=0.0001), 45.1% and 35.6% for LDL-c (p=0.16), 51.6% and 53.4% for HDL-c (p=0.79), 56.4% and 43.3% for non-HDL cholesterol (p=0.03) and 58.0% and 55.1% for atherogenic index (p=0.66), respectively. The proportion of patients reaching all the optimal treatment goals (non-HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, arterial blood pressure and triglycerides) was 6.4% for type 1 diabetic patients and 4.4% for type 2 patients (p=0.6). Factors associated with achieving goal values in a multiple regression analysis were drug treatment for high blood pressure, use of lipid lowering drugs, insulin use and a history of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are not comparable with other publications of series evaluating the same parameters in open populations. The results show that the degree of control of evaluated risk factors is not good, principally in the case of glucemic control; it is necessary to plan strategies that help to reach these goals in diabetic patients.

Grado de control de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en una población de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 y 2 de difícil manejo / Degree of control of cardiovascular risk factors among a patient population with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2

Objetivo: Evaluar la medida en que se alcanzan las metas de control en un grupo de pacientes seleccionados con diabetes tipo 1 o 2. Métodos: Estudio transversal y descriptivo en el que se incluyeron pacientes atendidos de manera consecutiva en la Consulta Externa de Diabetes del Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán entre abril y julio de 2005; la población seleccionada era de difícil control metabólico; todos los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 recibían fármacos para controlar la glucemia, incluyendo insulina en 43% de ellos. Analizamos los criterios de control recomendados por la Asociación Americana de Diabetes, las cifras de colesterol no-HDL y el índice aterogénico. Resultados: Se incluyeron 530 pacientes: 468 (mujeres 58.8%) tenían diabetes tipo 2, con edad promedio de 58.5 años, y 62 (mujeres 65%) tenían diabetes tipo 1, con edad promedio de 31.2 años. El valor promedio de HbA1c fue de 10.2±2.8 y 9.0±2.4 para diabéticos tipo 1 y tipo 2. Las proporciones de pacientes con diabetes tipos 1 y 2 dentro de las metas de tratamiento fueron de 12.9 y 23.7% para HbA1c (p=0.02), 82.2 y 57.2% para presión arterial sistólica y diastólica (p=0.0001), 75.8 y 49.3% para triglicéridos (p=0.0001), 45.1 y 35.6% para c-LDL (p=0.16), 51.6 y 53.4% para c-HDL (p= 0.79), 56.4 y 43.3% para c-no-HDL (p=0.03) y 58.0% versus 55.1% para índice aterogénico (p=0.66). La proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron metas de colesterol no-HDL, HbA1c, presión arterial y triglicéridos fue de 6.4% para diabéticos tipo 1 y de 4.4% para diabéticos tipo 2 (p=0.6). En el análisis de regresión logística múltiple, las variables asociadas con mayor probabilidad de alcanzar las metas de control fueron el tratamiento con antihipertensivos, el uso de hipolipemiantes, de insulina y el antecedente de enfermedad vascular cerebral. Conclusiones: Si bien nuestros resultados no pueden ser directamente comparables con los publicados en otras series en poblaciones abiertas, muestran que el grado de control de los factores de riesgo considerados no es aceptable, sobre todo en los niveles de glucemia; es necesario implementar programas que ayuden a cumplir estas metas en pacientes diabéticos.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of control of metabolic goals in a group of very selected type 1 and 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was done. Patients were enrolled consecutively in the Diabetes Clinic in a tertiary-care hospital in México City during the period between april and july 2005. The population at this clinic is very selected as demonstrated by the fact that all type 2 diabetic patients were treated with drugs for diabetic control, including insulin in 43% of them. We used the goals recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as parameters to analyze and additionally included non-HDL cholesterol and the atherogenic index. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients were included; 468 (58.8% female) had type 2 diabetes, with an average age of 58.5 years; 62 (65% female) patients had type 1 diabetes, with an average age of 31.2 years. The mean HbA1c values were 10.2 +/- 2.8 and 9.0 +/- 2.4 in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, respectively. The proportion of diabetic type 1 and 2 patients reaching treatment goals were 12.9% and 23.7% for HbA1c (p=0.02), 82.2% and 57.2% for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.0001), 75.8% and 49.3% for triglycerides (p=0.0001), 45.1% and 35.6% for LDL-c (p=0.16), 51.6% and 53.4% for HDL-c (p=0.79), 56.4% and 43.3% for non-HDL cholesterol (p=0.03) and 58.0% and 55.1% for atherogenic index (p=0.66), respectively. The proportion of patients reaching all the optimal treatment goals (non-HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, arterial blood pressure and triglycerides) was 6.4% for type 1 diabetic patients and 4.4% for type 2 patients (p=0.6). Factors associated with achieving goal values in a multiple regression analysis were drug treatment for high blood pressure, use of lipid lowering drugs, insulin use and a history of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are not comparable with other publications of series evaluating the same parameters in open populations. The results show that the degree of control of evaluated risk factors is not good, principally in the case of glucemic control; it is necessary to plan strategies that help to reach these goals in diabetic patients.

High prevalence of celiac disease in Mexican Mestizo adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that celiac disease (CD) could affect 0.5% to 3% of the general population, including Mexican Mestizos, which represents a complex mixture of genetics, and constitutes the core of Mexican and Latin American populations. However, the association between CD and other conditions, specifically type-1 diabetes mellitus, in this population remains unknown. Thus, our aim was to determine the prevalence of both serologic and biopsy proven CD in Mexican Mestizo adults with type-1 diabetes. METHODS: Over a 6-month period, serum samples obtained from consecutive Mexican Mestizo adult patients (age >or=18 y) with type-1 diabetes were tested with a new generation human recombinant protein based IgA tissue transglutaminase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay commercial kit. All patients with positive serologic test results underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and small intestinal biopsies to confirm CD. RESULTS: Eighty-four type-1 diabetic patients were included (62 women, mean age 28.9+/-9 y). Overall, 9 patients (9/84) were positive for IgA tissue transglutaminase with a point prevalence of 10.7% (95% CI, 4%-17%). Seven patients agreed to undergo endoscopy. Five subjects had biopsy-proven CD (5.9%, 95% CI, 1.9%-13.3%). One patient had chronic diarrhea and other abdominal bloating; whereas the remaining 3 were asymptomatic. CD associated type-1 diabetic patients tended to have higher hemoglobin A1c levels (P=0.07), reflecting poor glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: As in other populations, we demonstrated a high prevalence of biopsy-proven CD (5.9%) among Mexican Mestizo patients with type-1 diabetes. Clinicians should be aware of this common association in this ethnic group.

Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic.

BACKGROUND: We compared the Omron 725 CIC device (Omron Healthcare Inc., Vernon Hills, Illinois, USA), which is designed to register the blood pressure on the arm, with a mercury sphygmomanometer. In addition, we evaluated the possible impact that this device might have on the decisions made in a hypertension clinic. METHODS: Patients (n=183) older than 18 years (range 18-84 years) with a wide range of systolic (87-197 mmHg) and diastolic (48-108 mmHg) blood pressures were included. Some of the standards of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and of the British Hypertension Society were used to evaluate the results of the automated device in clinical practice. RESULTS: Using Bland-Altman analysis, an underestimation of both measures was observed with the automated Omron 725 CIC device; the systolic pressure was 3.6+/-8.8 mmHg too low with a very wide range of -13.7 to 20.9 and the diastolic pressure was also 4.4+/-6.3 mmHg too low with a range of -8.1 to 16.9. Clinical decisions could have been changed in 24 of the 116 hypertensive patients (20.6%) if the readings of the automated device had been used instead of using the readings of a mercury sphygmomanometer. These could have included modifying the dosage or changing the medicine used. CONCLUSION: The blood pressure measurements by Omron 725 CIC are different from those of blood pressure readings taken with a mercury sphygmomanometer and this could affect clinical decisions in the diagnosis and follow-up of a hypertensive patient in an office environment.

Extracutaneous sporotrichosis in a patient with liver cirrhosis.

We report an unusual case of disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis with oral mucous and tracheal involvement in a forty-year-old male with a history of heavy drinking and liver cirrhosis. We also review the literature and other similar published cases.

Extracutaneous sporotrichosis in a patient with liver cirrhosis

Se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente de 40 años de edad conantecedente de alcoholismo intenso y cirrosis hepática que desarrolloesporotricosis cutánea diseminada con afectación a mucosa oral y tráquea.Se comenta la literatura correspondiente(AU)

We report an unusual case of disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis with oralmucous and tracheal involvement in a forty-year-old male with a history ofheavy drinking and liver cirrhosis. We also review the literature and othersimilar published cases(AU)